The My Lai Massacre Essay -- History Innocent Murder Historical Essays

The My Lai MassacreOn troop 16, 1968, in the Quang Ngai region of Vietnam, specifically My Lai, the United States military was involved in an appalling slaughter of some 500 Vietnamese civilians. There are numerous arguments as to why this incident even had the capacity to occur. Although some of the arguments seem valid, can one authentically make excuses for the slaughter of innocent people? The company that was responsible for the My Lai incident was the Charlie Company and throughout the company there were macrocosmy different accounts of what happened that reprehensible day. consequently there are a few contradictions about what had occurred, such as what the commanding officers exact instructions for the soldiers were. Even with these contradictions the results are obvious. The question that must be posed is whether these results make the American soldiers involved that day guilty. There is the fact that the environment of the Vietnam War made it very confusing to the sold iers exactly who the confrontation was, as well as providing a pent up frustration due to the inability to even engage in real combat with the enemy. If this is the episode though, why did some soldiers with the same frustrations refuse the orders and sit out on the action, why did some cry while firing, and why then did one man go so far as to place himself between the Vietnamese and the firing soldiers? If these men who did not see the sense in killing innocents were even out with their actions, then how come the ones who did partake were all found not guilty in court? The questions can keep going back and forth on this issue, but first what happened that day must be examined.Captain Earnest Medina was in charge of giving orders to the Charlie Company and in the early evening of March 15th a meeting was called. CPT Medina told the company that the next morning they would be moving into My Lai and attacking Vietcong forces there. He told them that all the civilians would be at t he market or would have already been moved out by the time that the soldiers arrived to carry out their planned attack. He said all that would be left in the village would be the Vietcong of the 48th battalion and Vietcong sympathizers. It was never clear what CPT Medina had said to do in the event of coming across civilians. Medina claimed in court that he had told the GIs not to kill women and children, to us... ... landing on the president for putting the soldiers out in the jungles of an un-winnable war. In conclusion, there are just similarly many people and too many things to place blame easily for this disturbing event. So the easy road was taken, just do not let this happen again. The military took time out to think about their training of soldiers. Commanders sent troops in the Desert storm operation into battle with the words, No My Laisyou hear? (Linder) History is said to be trusty for one reason- to learn from past mistakes so they will not be repeated, and that is a very good lesson to learn from My Lai and one that all hope was, in fact, learned. Works CitedChafe, William H. The Unfinished Journey America Since World War II. New York Oxford University Press, 1999.Goff, Richard, et al. The Twentieth Century A Brief Global History. Boston McGraw-Hill, 1998.Linder, Doug. An Introduction to the My Lai Courts Martial. Famous American Trails The My Lai Courts Martial, 1970. 15 Nov. 1999 <http//www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/mylai/Myl_intro.html>.Olson, James S., and Randy Roberts. My Lai A Brief History With Documents. Boston Bedford, 1998